SuperVision and Observation with HyperCard
Milton M. Schimke, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
Throughout the years of supervision and observation of student teachers and interns in music education, the presenter has pursed more efficient and effective means for carrying out this responsibility. With the arrival of desktop computers for Computer Assisted Instruction, thoughts of how a computer might be implemented in an observation setting often came to mind when observing a student teacher and hand-writing the typical observation report. The development of laptop computers and printers with battery packs appeared to provide the hardware for using this technology in an observation setting. Finally, in reviewing software for educational purposes, HyperCard 2.1 along with a Macintosh PowerBook computer became the software and hardware for applying computer technology to supervision and observation of student teachers and interns.
Criteria for SuperVision and Observation with HyperCard
After learning and practicing the basics of HyperCard 2.1, the next step was to determine the criteria for structuring a HyperCard stack to supervise and observe student teachers and interns in music education. Since coming to UW-Eau Claire in Fall 1969, the presenter has been responsible for this instructional area and has maintained copies of observation reports in individual files for each music student teacher and intern observed. Therefore, twenty-three and one-half years of observation reports were available for review in designing the stack, Spring 1993.
All of the reports contained in the foregoing files were read and tabulated. The resulting statements, questions, comments and suggestions were rewritten as concisely and succinctly as possible in preparation for sorting and placing the information on individual cards in the HyperCard stack. First, the results were divided into six observation categories in a Main Menu as follows:
Instructor Actions
Conducting
Instructional Planning
Instruction Areas
Pitch
Rhythm
Next, each of the preceding observation categories was linked to a card representing sub-topics of the category. For example, the following are the sub-topics for Instructor Actions:
Voice Projection
Eye Contact
Time fillers/lapses
Facial Expressions
Podium Actions
Classroom Management
Miscellaneous
Finally, cards were prepared representing each sub-topic. These cards follow each of the sub-topics. As an example, the following represent the cards for Voice Projection:
Good voice projection
Need to be more articulate
Keep your hands away from your mouth when speaking
Use voice inflections to maintain attention
Be more assertive through voice projection
Vary your speaking tempo
The design of the stack includes buttons that make it possible to return to the main menu of observation categories at anytime or choose one of the observation categories leading to the list of sub-topics for each category. Buttons on the cards and the arrow keys on the computer also provide a means for navigating card-to-card.
Hardware and Software
The following hardware and software were used to develop the stack and are currently implemented in the supervision and observation process:
Macintosh PowerBook 100 (8MB of memory)
Canon BJ-20 Bubble Jet Printer
HyperCard 2.1
Using the Stack
With the hardware and software described, the SuperVision and Observation with HyperCard stack is used as follows:
The observer chooses one of the observation categories that leads to a card with sub-topic choices.
Following the choice of a sub-topic, the observer can navigate from card-to-card with the arrow buttons available on each card or with the arrow keys on the computer choosing the card or cards with the statement, question, comment or suggestion applicable to the student teacher or intern observed.
To choose an applicable card from a sub-topic, the observer clicks on the icon (hand in file) in the right-hand corner of the card resulting in a Check Marked (ˆ) card.
Following the observation, all Checked (ˆ) cards can become a printed observation report by choosing Print Report from the File menu. This report can then be shared with the student teacher or intern in a conference and discussion (See Appendix for a Sample Report). Note that the observation report heading can include information such as the name of the student teacher or intern, class observed, name of school, date, time and cooperating teacher's name.
With limited knowledge of HyperCard, cards can be added to the stack or altered to fit the student observed.
Summary
The presenter currently uses this HyperCard stack for the supervision and observation of student teachers and interns in music education at UW-Eau Claire. As discussed, the stack is structured so that card additions and alterations are possible and realistically anticipated in order to keep it up-to-date and relevant to the students observed. The current stack contains 495 cards.
The knowledge gained from learning HyperCard programming language and design in structuring this stack has provided valuable insights and ideas for additional applications of this technology for enhancing instruction. Ideas for using HyperCard technology are unlimited.
Reference
HyperCard 2.1 [Computer software]. (1991). Salinas, CA: Registered Trademark of Apple Computer, Inc., Licensed to Claris Corporation.
Bibliography
Beekman, G. (1992). HyperCard 2 in a Hurry. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Lamb, A. & Myers, D. (1991). HyperCard Creativity Tool. Orange, California: Career Publishing, Inc.
Appendix
(Sample Report)
|
Student Teacher (Class) School 2/8/96
- 11:15 PM Cooperating Teacher's Name
|
|
| Good Voice projection | Eyes in score--too much |
|
Establish a routine for using podium - be consistent |
Use larger motion to stop within a selection - need to
get their attentio
|
|
Cut-offs need to be within tempo of the preceding beat |
Do not conduct notes - include style/division of beat within pattern |
|
You are mirror conducting too much |
Slight adjustment of hand position will
eliminate incorrect baton position |
|
Focus on phrasing is good |
Lesson planning and objectives are well done |
|
Instruction and Feedback time - good balance |
Choosing students to model - Very Good |
|
You adjust to student's abilities well |
Letting them analyze their performance -- very good technique
|
| Very good closure for each selection | |
|
Observation Report By Dr. M. M. Schimke, Content Supervisor, Dept. of Music, UW-EC |
|
Notes: The research and design of this HyperCard stack were made possible by a sabbatical, Spring Semester 1993, awarded by the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire and the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents.
SuperVision is available at http://imr.utsa.edu/Archives