Practice Games for Selected Musical Concepts in a Level Six Kodaly Curriculum Created in Hypercard Stacks

Colleen Pinar, Fort Hays State University

Introduction

Today's computer technology is advancing to levels which were only dreamt of years ago. The need to be computer literate is becoming a widespread requirement in our society. This may mean different things in a divergent society, particularly to music educators. With the struggle to validate the inclusion of music in education and the "back to basics" atmosphere in our country, there is a need to bring music and technology together. This will surely help to substantiate music as an essential component in a visionary, innovative education curriculum, up-to-date with other "back to basics" subjects. Because music educators are aware of this need, they are becoming more computer literate and are using this technology in the classroom. Computer programs written for the elementary music classroom are available, but few in number. It may be useful for today's music educators to examine their school music curriculum and enhance it through the use of existing and/or new software. In doing so, music education will continue to advance with technology and will be considered not only an educational, aesthetic medium, but also a performance and technology medium, addressing the need for computer literacy.

The purpose of this study is to investigate some capabilities of the Macintosh computer and the HyperCard software in creating teaching aids called infogames. These aids contain information on Level Six Kodaly concepts and games that develop selected concepts. Other purposes of this study are:

1. to utilize the capabilities of technology in the Kodaly Approach and in general music pedagogy,

2. to discover whether computer software can enrich the teaching of Level Six Kodaly concepts,

3. to create a series of educational games and information exercises using the computer authoring program, HyperCard, which can be utilized by an individual or a group of children studying Level Six Kodaly concepts.

Zoltan Kodaly

Zoltan Kodaly (1882-1967), Hungarian composer and educator, was truly a reformer of music education. Hungarians, prior to the early part of the twentieth century, were trained in the Western European tradition in music and were losing their true Hungarian musical heritage, the folk music of the peasant class (Zemke, 1976, p. 2). This situation and the lack of prepared music students at the academy of Music in Budapest led Kodaly to realize that the music education system of his homeland was not meeting the needs of the Hungarian people. This realization prompted Kodaly to look for ways to reform music education.

The natural outgrowth of Kodaly’s Hungarian folk song research and Kodaly’s and Jeno Adam’s search for the best approach/tools for teaching music education led Kodaly to develop a philosophy of music education which uses folk music as its basis. Hungary’s music education system was reformed as a result of this research (Zemke, 1976, p. 70). By the mid-twentieth century, Kodaly, his colleagues, and his students solidified their approach to music education with objectives:

1. to develop to the fullest extent possible the innate musicality present in all children,

2. to make the language of music known to children; to help them become musically literate in the fullest sense of the word -- able to read, write, and create with the vocabulary of music,

3. to make the children’s musical heritage -- the folk songs of their language and culture - known to them,

4. to make available to children the great art music of the world, so that through performing, listening, studying, and analyzing masterworks they will come to a love and appreciation of music based on knowledge about music (Choksy et al., 1986, p. 72),

5. to show that singing is the foundation of all music and the voice the most accessible instrument to everyone (Carder, 1970, p. 93),

6. to incorporate relative solmization (sol-fa) adapted from Tonic Solfa used in England, and many solfa techniques derived from the Dalcroze approach,

7. to use rhythm syllables modified from the Galin - Paris - Cheve approach,

8. to use hand-signs adapted from the Curwen approach. This child developmental approach to comprehensive music education was not invented by Kodaly. He, together with his colleagues and students, developed a philosophy of music education from previously separate music techniques which together became a method (Choksy et al., 1986, p. 72).

Music Technology

Music technology with even sophisticated music software will not replace teachers; technology merely provides a learning aid for building skills (Penfold, 1991, p. 3). As with any new development, some music educators will be intimidated by the new technology, but if used consistently, teachers will find a wide range of approaches for use in their classrooms. Using technology in the music classroom may mean different things to different people, as it ranges from basic word-processing and synthesizer in Jazz Band to a truly integrated music technology instruction. Berger says instruction is not truly integrated "unless it has a powerful effect on the teaching and learning experience within a given class or, indeed, actually becomes central to the activities within a course" (Zemke, 1976, p. 14). He goes on to say there are four levels of computer use:

1. " to enhance existing materials and approaches: a computer can help instructors to do everyday applications more efficiently.

2. to use existing software: a wide variety of software is available commercially and is often included with textbooks to enhance their teaching potential.

3. to adapt existing software and videodisks: many instructors have used authoring programs to create applications that provide instructional aids" (Berger, 1993, p. 14).

4. "to create original courseware: the ease of some authoring programs has instructors creating their own instructional software, everything from drill and practice exercises to interactive multimedia simulations" (Berger, 1993, p. 16). Further, he states that these four stages do not reflect technology integration or reflect an order of usage. "This range in approach toward technology integration is due, in part, to varying trends in institutional support for computing over time, as well as the appropriateness of using technology to deliver the course content" (Berger, 1993, p. 16).

Some computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can significantly aid students since it helps them engage in a more comprehensive approach to education, thus allowing for various learning styles. Students can work at their own pace, interest areas, and location beyond the classroom, thus facilitating learning that is more complete and retained longer (Dunnigan, 1993, p. 34). Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) can also utilize various technology, including Hypermedia which fosters both accelerated and improved retention of information (Wulfekuhle, 1994, p. 77). Nicholas Wulfekuhle, program manager for Training Advanced Communication Systems, Inc., defines the term Hypermedia: "Hypermedia combines the information storage and retrieval aspects of hyperlinking technology which allows people to learn more naturally by linking theory to application rather than moving sequentially from one item to the next, with multimedia elements such as apertures, video, sound, diagrams, etc." This, Wulfekuhle says, "stimulates the students' interests" (1994, p. 77).

Hypermedia programs allow for customizing authoring programs to fit specific learning needs. Since learning is largely dependent upon what the students see and hear, audio and visual capabilities are essential. Visual media allows students to concretely see what they are learning, therefore it is essential that hypermedia software used in this learning incorporate a variety of visuals into each lesson (Wulfekuhle, 1994, p. 78). Wulfekuhle foresees that Hypermedia will reduce education and training costs along with the decreased time needed to comprehend and retain new learnings (p. 80). Though Hypermedia has many benefits, as with any learning tools, Hypermedia software and Computer-Based Training programs (CBT) must be selected carefully to insure that students comprehend material rather than only the program structure. Wulfekuhle goes on to say that the definition of Hypermedia has not been fully standardized, and its implication for use may vary (p. 78). Wulfekuhle in the article, "Selecting a Hypermedia Authoring Program For CBT," offers these guidelines:

1. "Conduct a training needs analysis.

2. Determine what authoring programs are commercially available.

3. Develop an analysis criteria by which prospective programs will be compared" (p. 77).

Criteria for Children Software

After each software needs criterion is analyzed, each software's worth is judged. Margaret B. Puckett, and Janet K. Black, writers of the book, Authentic Assessment of the Young Child, quotes from another book, The Young Child: Development From Prebirth Through Age Eight by Janet Black, Margaret Puckett, and Michael Bell in presenting ten criteria for developmentally appropriate software for young children:

1. "Are children able to boot up the software program independently?

2. Are children able to understand the initial directions? Are the directions presented using a variety of senses (auditory, visual - both words and graphics)?

3. Is the vocabulary used in the program appropriate to the children’s developmental level?

4. Do children know when they are correct and incorrect? Are approximations acknowledged/rewarded appropriate levels?

5. Are the program keyboard functions too complex for young children? Are the participants required to strike one, two, or three keys at one time?

6. Are the program graphics complementary, appropriate, or distracting?

7. Does the program have an audio component: Are the sound levels appropriate for the learning environment (too loud, too soft)? Is the audio component of the program accurate? (Does a bird sound like a bird in the computer program?)

8. Does the program offer children choices? How many? Are the choices appropriate, too simple, or inappropriately complex?

9. Is the computer program congruent with the content and scope of the classroom curriculum, or is "computing" viewed as isolated learning experiences?" (Holzmiller,, 1993, p. 138)

Anderson, summarizes what he considers guidelines for selecting developmentally appropriate music software:

1. "What are the goals of the program? How are they addressed and what evaluation tools are included?

2. Is adequate documentation provided? Is there a clearly written sheet or booklet accompanying the program that describes prior learning required, information on loading disks, and procedures to follow in using the program?

3. Can the program be used with your equipment?

4. Does the program meet your curricular needs and objectives?

5. Is the program easy to use ( is it user friendly)?

6. Does the program give adequate feedback to the student for right and wrong answers?

7. Is the subject matter presented accurately?

8. Is the music notation visually correct? (The notes and symbols should not be unusual sizes or shapes.)

9. Do the pitches sound in tune?

10. Does he music sound "electronic" or like real voices or instruments?

11. If the students hits a wrong key, does the program stop? (it shouldn’t.)

12. Are there clear exit instructions? (Students should be able to get out of the program, go back to the main menu, or move to a new program with ease.)" (Anderson & Lawrence, 1995, p. 15)

Conclusion

Just as Kodaly's goal was to develop a music education curriculum on which to build a complete education, music educators today must strive to develop student exposure to all facets of music. One way to accomplish this is to incorporate computer technology into the music classroom. In doing so, music education will continue to advance with technology and possibly unleash hidden creative powers. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI), using specially designed software will allow flexibility in the music classroom, thus facilitating a more comprehensive approach to music education. CAI allows for various learning styles, interest areas, and music creation, resulting in enhanced appreciation of music.

The capabilities of the Macintosh computer and the HyperCard computer software in creating a series of educational games and information exercises would possibly enrich the teaching of selected Level Six Kodaly concepts utilized by an individual or group of children. Addressed within this project are Kodaly's writings, which may lend themselves to support technology in music education. Other technology and music education concerns were considered in their developmental factors in using computer assisted-instruction in the music classroom.

Several conclusions can be drawn from this study. Some of these are drawn from the writings of Zoltan Kodaly's futuristic thrust, rationalizing about music and music education; others relate directly to the overlaying or pairing of music with technology, and from field testing the infogames.

We must not believe in a teacher who only wants to teach what he has learned, who does not want to eliminate in his pupils the mistakes of his own education, who does not proclaim -- study, child, be wiser than your father (Carder, 1970, p. 164).

Today's computer technology is advancing and evolving, and the need to be computer literate is no longer a choice but an imperative. Music education together with technology can aid in the development of musical literacy and musical aesthetics; in turn, students will be better prepared for the future, and music educators will be more effective teachers.

References

Anderson, W., & Lawrence, J. E. (1995). Integrating music into the elementary classroom. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Berger, C. (1993, November/December). Teaching with technology - Trends in integration. Higher Education Product Companion , 14-16.

Dunnigan, P. (1993, July) The computer in instrumental music. Music Educators Journal 80,(1), 32-33.

Carder, P. (1990). The eclectic curriculum in American music education: Contributions of Dalcroze, Kodaly, and Orff. Reston, VA.: Music Educators National Conference.

Choksy, L., et al. (1986). Teaching music in the twentieth century. Englewood Cliffs, N J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Holzmiller, C. (1993). A spiral-styled approach activities within a Kodaly - based curriculum. (Master's thesis, Silver Lake College).

Kodaly, S. (Ed.). (1974).The selected writings of Zoltan Kodaly. NY: Boosey and Hawkes.

Penfold, P. (1991, Fall).. Bach to the future. Summit , 6-8.

Wulfekuhle, N. (1994, February). Selecting a hypermedia authoring program for CBT. T. H. E. Journal, 21(7), 77-80.

Zemke, L. (1976). Kodaly 35 lesson plans and folk song supplement. Champaign, IL.: Mark Foster Music Company.